.png)
Most construction problems are avoidable at the design stage
The traditional model splits responsibility between a designer and a builder. In theory, they coordinate. In practice, the gaps between them create real problems.
Drawings get finalised without builder input so the documentation doesn't reflect what's actually buildable or affordable. Cost savings are identified too late because the builder wasn't part of the design conversation. Approvals stall because no single party owns the full submission process.
When something goes wrong, the designer points to the builder and the builder points to the drawings. You're left in the middle sorting out a problem that didn't need to exist.
How one team managing both design and construction changes the outcome
Construction input from the first design decision
Our construction knowledge shapes design decisions from the start. Buildability, material selection, and programme implications are considered before drawings are finalised rather than discovered after.
Cost planning aligned to design development
The budget is developed alongside the design rather than applied after it. This means cost decisions are made when they can still influence the outcome rather than when the only option is to cut scope.
Approvals owned by one team
We manage the full approvals pathway from design submissions through to construction certification. One team coordinating both means nothing falls between consultant documentation and authority requirements.
Consultant coordination under one programme
Architects, engineers, and services consultants are briefed, managed, and held accountable to the construction programme. Their documentation is reviewed for conflicts and buildability before it reaches site.
One contract with no split in accountability
Design coordination and construction delivery sit under one contract. When a decision is needed or a problem arises, there is one team responsible for resolving it. No finger-pointing. No gaps.
.png)
How design & construct compares to the traditional delivery model
Both models can deliver successful projects. The difference is in how accountability, cost,
and communication are structured across the design and construction phases.
Traditional
Split between designer and builder. When issues arise, the client often mediates between the two parties.
Design is completed before the builder prices. Budget misalignment is often discovered late, requiring scope reductions or redesign.
Design must be fully completed before construction can be priced and programmed. This creates a sequential timeline with limited overlap.
Client coordinates between separate design and construction teams. Multiple channels increase miscommunication risk.
The client engages the designer directly and has full control over the design relationship and outcomes.
Responsibility for approvals can sit with the designer, the builder, or the client, depending on the contract structure. This can create gaps in ownership.
Design & Construct
One team is accountable for both design coordination and construction delivery. Issues are resolved internally.
Cost planning runs alongside design development. Budget alignment is maintained at every stage so surprises are reduced.
Construction planning begins during design development, allowing phases to overlap where appropriate and compressing the overall programme.
One team manages all communication. The client has a single point of contact for design and construction decisions.
The client retains approval authority at every design stage. The difference is that construction knowledge informs those decisions earlier.
One team owns the full approvals pathway from design submissions through to construction certification with no gap in responsibility.
Working across sectors where timing and detail are essential
Quick Service Restaurants (QSR)
.png)
Fast-paced environments where brand standards, services, and staging must align. We understand drive-thru layouts, kitchen coordination, and the importance of a smooth opening.
Hospitality
.png)
Customer-focused venues where layout, finishes, and back-of-house flow matter. We coordinate services carefully so the space operates efficiently from day one.
Retail
.png)
Shopping centre and standalone tenancies requiring clear landlord coordination and precise execution. We manage approvals and staging to keep the build organised and presentable.
Fitness & Wellness
.png)
High-use environments that require durable finishes and smart planning. We build spaces that support equipment integration, member flow, and long-term performance.
Education
.png)
Educational facilities where construction must work around active campuses and strict term schedules. We coordinate staged works carefully to minimise disruption to learning.
Office
.png)
Workplaces designed to support collaboration and day-to-day productivity. We deliver tailored interiors that balance brand presentation with practical functionality.
How a design & construct project with us actually works
.png)
Submit your project brief
Share your project objectives, site information, budget parameters, and any existing documentation. This helps us understand your requirements and assess whether Design & Construct is the right model for your project.
.png)
Initial discussion and model alignment
We review your brief and arrange a conversation to clarify scope, objectives, and stakeholder requirements. We also discuss how the Design & Construct model applies to your specific project and confirm it's the right fit for both sides.
.png)
Design coordination and cost development
We engage and manage consultants, coordinate design development, and build the cost plan in parallel. You review and approve the design at each stage before it progresses. Construction knowledge informs every design decision so buildability and budget stay aligned throughout.
.png)
Authority approvals and pre-construction
Once the design is approved, we manage all authority submissions, finalise trade procurement, confirm long-lead materials, and lock in the construction programme. Your project is fully coordinated before site work begins.
.png)
Construction and reporting
Our team manages the site daily while you receive regular progress updates, cost tracking, and documented variation approvals. The same team that coordinated your design is now delivering the construction so nothing is lost in translation between the two.
.png)
Handover
Your space is handed over with full documentation, warranties, and compliance certification. From design intent through to finished space, the outcome reflects what was agreed at every approval stage.
Projects completed to meet brand and operational demands
What our clients value in working with us
“We worked with Crafted Spaces on the build of our brewery and bar fitout at Ocean Reach Brewing in Cowes including the installation of our 1500L brewhouse. Building a brewery requires specialist knowledge and precision and their team clearly understands the unique requirements of brewing facilities. Having been involved in multiple brewery builds across Victoria I've seen how important it is to work with builders who don't cut corners. Crafted Spaces holds themselves to very high standards and I would not hesitate to recommend them to anyone looking to build or fit out a brewery or hospitality venue.”
.avif)
Simon Bismire
“Crafted Spaces and Shane Sandford did an incredible job in bringing this restaurant to life. It’s been a pleasure partnering with you to lift it from the pages and make it a reality. Someone said to me today, “It looks just like the renders…. Actually better!” And that response is one of countless that highlight your team's maniacal focus on the detail, functionality and personification of our brand. Crafted is now part of history, building the highest volume Wendy’s restaurant ever, anywhere in the world. Thank you!”
.avif)
Common questions about design & construct projects
No. You retain full approval authority at every stage of design development. No design decision progresses without your sign-off. The difference is that construction knowledge informs those decisions earlier, which means fewer surprises when the build begins.
We develop the cost plan alongside the design with full transparency at every stage. You see what is driving the cost and why. We also welcome independent cost reviews at any point if additional assurance is needed.
We can work with existing documentation and design relationships. In some cases, we take over the coordination of existing consultants. In others, we review what has been completed and continue development from that point. The model adapts to where your project currently sits.
Not always. It works best when the client values cost alignment during design, streamlined communication, and single-point accountability. For projects where the client wants full independent control over the design relationship, the traditional model may be more appropriate. We are happy to discuss which model suits your specific project.
We brief, engage, and manage all consultants, including architects, engineers, and service designers. Their scope is aligned to the construction programme, and their documentation is reviewed for buildability and conflicts before finalisation. You maintain oversight and approval authority throughout.
We own the full approvals pathway from initial design submissions through to construction certification and occupancy. Because the same team manages both design documentation and construction compliance, there are no gaps in the submission process, and approvals are coordinated with enough lead time to protect the programme.
In most cases yes. Because construction planning begins during design development, certain phases can overlap rather than running sequentially. This is one of the practical advantages of having one team manage both disciplines. The extent of compression depends on the project scope and approval requirements.
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)